NMDA receptor antibodies

Objectives: To analyze the frequency of NMDA receptor (NMDAR) antibodies in patients with various inflammatory demyelinating diseases of the CNS and to determine their clinical correlates. Methods: Retrospective case-control study from 2005 to 2014 with the detection of serum IgG antibodies to NMDAR, aquaporin-4, and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein by recombinant live cell-based immunofluorescence assays. Fifty-one patients with acute disseminated encephalomyelitis, 41 with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders, 34 with clinically isolated syndrome, and 89 with multiple sclerosis (MS) were included. Due to a known association of NMDAR antibodies with seizures and behavioral symptoms, patients with those clinical manifestations were preferentially included and are therefore overrepresented in our cohort. Nine patients with NMDAR encephalitis, 94 patients with other neurologic diseases, and 48 healthy individuals were used as controls. Results: NMDAR antibodies were found in all 9 patients with NMDAR encephalitis but in only 1 of 215 (0.5%) patients with inflammatory demyelination and in none of the controls. This patient had relapsing-remitting MS with NMDAR antibodies present at disease onset, with an increase in NMDAR antibody titer with the onset of psychiatric symptoms and cognitive deficits. Conclusion: In demyelinating disorders, NMDAR antibodies are uncommon, even in those with symptoms seen in NMDAR encephalitis. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm 2015;2:e141; doi: 10.1212/NXI.0000000000000141 GLOSSARY ADEM 5 acute disseminated encephalomyelitis; AQP4 5 aquaporin-4; CBA 5 cell-based assay; CIS 5 clinically isolated syndrome; IHC 5 immunohistochemistry; MOG 5 myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein; MS 5 multiple sclerosis; NMDAR 5 NMDA receptor; NMOSD 5 neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder; ON 5 optic neuritis. NMDA receptor (NMDAR) encephalitis is characterized by the presence of IgG autoantibodies against NMDAR in serum and CSF and affects mainly pediatric and young adult female patients. The first symptoms are frequently psychiatric, followed by seizures, dyskinesias, memory deficits, and speech problems, often leading to autonomic instabilities. Autoantibodies against NMDAR are also found in cases of CNS demyelinating diseases such as acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM), optic neuritis (ON), neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSDs), or multiple sclerosis (MS). Recent data point to a possible association of NMDAR antibodies with demyelination in some patients, particularly when IgG antibodies against glial surface antigens aquaporin-4 (AQP4) or myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) are present. This is a unique study to systematically investigate the seroprevalence of NMDAR antibodies in patients with CNS demyelinating diseases. We retrospectively screened a cohort of patients with demyelinating diseases for IgG antibodies against NMDAR, AQP4, and MOG. From the Clinical Department of Neurology (M. Ramberger, G.B., K.S., A.L., F.D., T.B., M. Reindl) and Department of Pediatrics I (K.R., M.B.), Medical University of Innsbruck, Austria; Institute of Neurology (R.H.), Medical University of Vienna, Austria; Pediatric Neurology (K.R.), Witten/Herdecke University, Children’s Hospital Datteln, Datteln, Germany; Department of Neurology (F.A.-D.), Karl Landsteiner Institute for Neuroimmunological and Neurodegenerative Disorders, Sozialmedizinisches Zentrum Ost Donauspital, Vienna, Austria; and Neuroimmunology and Multiple Sclerosis Research (A.L.), Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Switzerland. Funding information and disclosures are provided at the end of the article. Go to Neurology.org/nn for full disclosure forms. The Article Processing Charge was paid by Austrian Science Foundation (FWF grant W1206 SPIN). This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND), which permits downloading and sharing the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially. Neurology.org/nn © 2015 American Academy of Neurology 1 METHODS Patients and controls. Serum samples for this retrospective case-control study were collected in the Clinical Department of Neurology Innsbruck between 2005 and 2014 and stored at 280°C until use. All patients fulfilled diagnostic criteria as described below. Serum samples from 366 individuals were included: 51 patients with ADEM, 41 patients with NMOSD, 34 patients with clinically isolated syndrome (CIS), and 89 patients with MS. Nine patients with NMDAR encephalitis, 94 patients with other neurologic diseases, and 48 healthy individuals were included as controls. Most of the patients have previously been included in a study on NMDAR antibody assay validation and in other studies on MOG and/or AQP4 antibodies. NMOSDs were diagnosed as described by Wingerchuk et al. in 2007, ADEM was diagnosed according to the criteria of the International Pediatric MS Study Group, and MS and CIS were diagnosed according to the 2005 revisions to the McDonald criteria, as previously described. Diagnosis of NMDAR encephalitis was based on clinical assessment (e.g., new onset of neuropsychiatric symptoms) and demonstration of antibodies in serum or CSF, as recommended recently. The relative frequency of symptoms suggestive of NMDAR encephalitis was selectively increased in our cohort of patients with demyelinating diseases (figure). Standard protocol approvals, registrations, and patient consents. The present study was approved by the ethical committee of Innsbruck Medical University (study numbers AM3041A and AM4059). All patients or their legal representatives gave written informed consent to the study protocol. Live cell-based assays for antibody detection. For the detection of autoantibodies against NMDAR, AQP4, and MOG we used live HEK293A cells transfected with the respective complementary DNA, as described previously. The following cutoff values were used: $1:20 for NMDAR antibodies, $1:160 for MOG antibodies, and $1:20 for AQP4 antibodies. To prove the specificity of antibody binding, serum samples were preincubated with HEK293A cells expressing NMDAR or nontransfected HEK293A. One CSF sample was tested for NMDAR antibodies as described above, except CSF was applied undiluted but supplemented with MK-801 (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) and further diluted (1:2, 1:4, etc.) in washing buffer containing MK-801. NMDAR antibody testing with fixed cell-based assay (CBA) and rat brain immunohistochemistry (IHC) was done as described recently. RESULTS Demographic data and the NMDAR, MOG, and AQP4 antibody seroprevalence of all patients and controls are shown in the table. Serum NMDAR antibodies were present in 9/9 (100%) patients with NMDAR encephalitis, in only 1/89 (1%) patients with MS, and in none of the other cases. CSF positivity of NMDAR antibodies was confirmed in all patients with NMDAR encephalitis by fixed CBA and/or tissue IHC. CSF from the patient with MS with low titer (1:20) serum NMDAR antibodies at disease onset was negative for NMDAR antibodies in our live CBA but positive in the fixed CBA and IHC. In contrast, serum was negative in the fixed CBA despite being positive in live CBA and weakly positive in IHC. At the age of 23, this woman presented with paresthesia of the left hand. MRI showed multiple MStypical T2 lesions, and investigation of CSF showed the presence of oligoclonal bands and 15 cells/mL. The patient was diagnosed with MS, and complete remission was observed after treatment with highdose methylprednisolone. Three months later, ON coincided with a clear increase in T2 lesions on MRI, and she was again treated with methylprednisolone followed by complete remission. However, ON reoccurred 3 years after disease onset, and the patient had residual visual deficit despite methylprednisolone treatment. The patient repeatedly declined Figure Overview of patients with demyelinating diseases, presence of clinical symptoms frequently associated with NMDAR encephalitis, and antibody status We included 215 patients with demyelinating CNS disorders. Of these, 81 presented with seizures and/or behavioral symptoms whereas 134 did not. As expected, all 9 patients with NMDA receptor (NMDAR) encephalitis presented with seizures and/or behavioral symptoms. Ab5 antibody; ADEM5 acute disseminated encephalomyelitis; AQP45 aquaporin-4; CIS5 clinically isolated syndrome; HC 5 healthy controls; MOG 5 myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein; MS5multiple sclerosis; NMDAR-E5 NMDAR encephalitis; NMOSD5 neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder; OND 5 other neurologic diseases. 2 Neurology: Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation disease-modifying therapy. Nine months later she gave birth to a healthy child. Three months postpartum, at the age of 26, the patient presented with psychiatric (dysphoria, logorrhea) and cognitive (dyscalculia, frontal executive disorder, psychomotor slowing) symptoms. MRI showed dramatic progression of T2 lesion load and serum was positive for low titer antinuclear antibodies. Absorption of patient serum with NMDARtransfected cells abolished the NMDAR-specific signal in the live CBA, whereas incubation with nontransfected cells did not, proving the specificity of antibodies against NMDAR. Antibodies against MOG or AQP4 were absent at any time point. Before the patient could be treated for an autoimmune cause of the psychiatric symptoms, she was transferred to an outside psychiatric hospital and no further clinical data were available. Demographic, clinical, and antibody data of all patients with demyelinating CNS disorders with seizures and/or behavioral symptoms, which are the major initial symptoms of NMDAR encephalitis, are shown in the figure. DISCUSSION Overall, we found serum NMDAR antibodies in 1 of 215 patients with CNS demyelinating diseases, suggesting that the frequency of those autoantibodies is very low (,1%). Although a low false-positive rate of IgG NMDAR antibodies was reported recently, in our study serum IgG NMDAR antibodies were only present in patients with symptoms suggestive of NMDAR encephalitis. The major limitation of our study was the small number of available CSF samples, which could have possibly yielded a higher number of NMDAR antibody–positive patients with demyelinating diseases when using suitable testing methods. As demonstrated here, live CBAmight be more sensitive for detecting low titer serumNMDAR antibodies but not for testing CSF samples, as currently used. The disease course of the 1 patient with MS and NMDAR antibodies was initially typical for relapsing-remitting MS with residual visual deficits after the second episode of ON. Because analysis of NMDAR antibodies was done retrospectively, the occurrence of antibodies during the first episode of demyelination was not known at that time point. CSF was positive for NMDAR antibodies at disease onset, in line with studies suggesting CSF to be more sensitive than serum. With the onset of psychiatric and cognitive symptoms, serum NMDAR antibody titers increased. Unfortunately, CSF was not available from the second time point. This case demonstrates that NMDAR autoantibodies can be linked with demyelination, which has been shown in a recent study investigating a cohort of 691 patients with NMDAR encephalitis, identifying a subgroup of patients with demyelinating episodes. Most reported cases (18/23) of demyelinating syndromes overlapping with the presence of NMDAR antibodies were positive for at least 1 antibody associated with demyelination, namely antibodies against MOG or AQP4. In our case, those antibodies were not found. Of note, NMDAR encephalitis–related symptoms occurred 3 months after the patient gave birth to a healthy child, paralleling a recently described case, although our case showed a less severe disease course. We found NMDAR antibodies to be rare in demyelinating diseases, even when focusing on patients with symptoms suggestive of NMDAR encephalitis. In the case described here, the presence of NMDAR antibodies preceded the occurrence of symptoms associated with NMDAR encephalitis. Thus, serum NMDAR antibodies could have diagnostic value for an overlapping NMDAR encephalitis–related disease course in patients with demyelinating diseases. AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS Conceived and designed the experiments: M. Ramberger, G.B., M. Reindl. Performed the experiments: M. Ramberger, K.S., R.H., M. Reindl. Analyzed the data: M. Ramberger, M. Reindl. Contributed reagents/ materials/analysis: G.B., R.H., K.R., M.B., F.A.-D., A.L., F.D., T.B. Wrote the manuscript: M. Ramberger, G.B., M. Reindl.